Response to Bell v. Tavistock Judgment from WPATH, EPATH, USPATH, AsiaPATH, CPATH, AusPATH, PATHA

 
From: "WPATH" <wpath@PROTECTED>
Subject: Response to Bell v. Tavistock Judgment from WPATH, EPATH, USPATH, AsiaPATH, CPATH, AusPATH, PATHA
Date: December 17th 2020

                                                       

 

WPATH, EPATH, USPATH, AsiaPATH, CPATH, AusPATH, PATHA

Response to Bell v. Tavistock Judgment

 

Statement Regarding Medical Affirming Treatment including Puberty Blockers for Transgender Adolescents

 

The Boards of Directors of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), the European Association for Transgender Health (EPATH), the United States Professional Association for Transgender health (USPATH), the Asian Association for Transgender Health (AsiaPATH), the Canadian Association for Transgender Health (CPATH), the Australian Professional Association for Trans Health (AusPATH), and the Professional Association for Transgender Health Aotearoa (PATHA) all strongly disagree with the recent judgment of the London High Court in Bell v. Tavistock. We believe this decision will result in significant harm to the affected children and their families. We oppose this ruling and urge that this ruling be appealed and overturned.

Click here for the full statement.

Click here to view on the WPATH website.

rss/atom
‹ A Message from Dr. Marci Bowers re WPATH Presidency
Index
Renew Your WPATH Membership Now, Before It's Too Late ›
  • This mailing list is a private mailing list. There may be additional steps in order to join, and the List Owner controls who may leave the mailing list.

  • This mailing list is announce-only.

WPATH mailing list

Privacy Policy:

Privacy